fPO×FWvPF sPFMÀePÝAÙPO EHPiSPFXP iGPLAXPNPA


aHPsPFrP-ePrP ePvhPF aMSPFE`WvPF û``utPOE`rP hPF``u`bPL``uCPFP nPLArPQ oPF ESPFSFU``udPLrP ãO÷PABPOAE`HPkPP E`HPkPPA``uSPFrP pPOL``uTP çpPOLE`tPOHPÓ÷PìkPPtPOA ãO÷PrPìpPOL E`lPËP û``uHPXPmPFz E`nPLmFZYlP kPPrP``utPO wvPOðsPFgPOYQkFÖOtPO sPFMëPOA 'sFUtPOAnFUE`WvPFrP sPFKPz'PrP
sPFhPF``uyPAEgPOtPOAbPL|

sFUtPOnFUE`WvPFrP sPFKPz sPFMëPOArP sPF``uËP uyPAgPOA``uyPA``ugPOrP E`VPFkPPAnPLA:
vhPF-umPFvhPFlP: sutanutisakhya@yahoo.com cPFlPBPOAXP: 9830753678


To print a page from this site, Haraf font has to be downloaded and saved in Windows/Fonts folder:

DOWNLOAD FONT

 




District South 24 Pgns.
In The Court Of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate At Diamond Harbour

M.Case 451/07
Amita Kayal – Petitioner.
-Vs-
Goutam Kayal –Opp.Party.


Copy of Order
Dt. 25.06.08

Record is taken up for order as today is fixed for passing order.


It appears from the record that the notice through post as sent to O.P’s address did not return even after four months time. Though the postal receipts was there to show that notice sent to O.P’s address and considering the same it was demand as service of notice upon the O.P. and thereafter the case was heard exparte.

The petitioner’s case in gist is that since after few months of the marriage, her husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law (Debar) started physical and mental torture upon the petitioner as petitioner is not looking good and they pressed the petitioner to bring case of Rs. 10,000/- for her father’s house and to fulfill their demand of cash, they used to assault the petitioner and even kept her under starvation. Petitioner gave birth of a female baby by the conjugal relation with the O.P. Petitioner was enduring the torture at her in –law’s house but on 29.06.07. O.P and his family members after assaulting the petitioner drove her out from her in-law’s house with out any belongings and being compelled, petitioner along with her child took shelter at her father’s house and lodged G.D. being No. 1726 Dt. 29.06.07 Despite taking place of several sittings before Panchayat the O.P. and his family members did not agree to compromise the dispute. Petitioner having no income and being tortured lady has been passing her days along with her child through inconvenience for want of food.

Under the circumstance, petitioner prayed for relief u/s. 18,19,20,21 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

On perusal of the testimony of the petitioner, it to appears that her testimony is the resemblance of the contentions of her petition u/s. of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

The three papers filled by the petitioner prove that there were several sittings for compromising the dispute but from the end of O.P. there was no positive intention to take the petitioner which constrained the petitioner to come before the court for relief. Petitioner in her evidence, stated that she prays for an order so that she can reside with her husband in peace. This prayer of the petitioner is like other married women and so long the marital tie exits the petitioner to live with her husband in her fundamental right guaranteed by the constitution. In the present case it has primafacie proved that domestic violence taken place in the in-law’s house and petitioner is aggrieved person. Therefore, the prayer of the petitioner is found allowable.


Hence,

ORDERED

that the M.Case is allowed exparte against the O.P. and thereby O.P. is directed to bring back the petitioner along with her child from the petitioner’s father’s house to O.P.’s residence or at a rented house within 15 days from the receiving of this order and to maintain the petitioner and her child. Otherwise petitioner is entitled to maintenance @ Rs. 750/- P.M. for herself and @ Rs. 450/- P.M. for the petitioner’s daughter from the month of June, 2008.


If O.P. takes back the petitioner as directed, O.C. Kakdwip will visit the residence of the O.P. once in every month and on 1st Saturday of each month shall report to the court for six month.


If the O.P. neither takes back the petitioner nor pays her maintenance by 90(Ninety0 days from knowledge, penalty will follow as per section 30 of the Act.


O.C. Kakdwip is directed to hand over the copy of this order to O.P. by 48hours from his receiving the copy of the order.


Let two sets of copies of order be sent to O.C. Kakdwip for his information and compliance.


Let another copy of this order be supplied to the petitioner at free of cost.


Sd/-T.C.Das
A.C.J.M
Memo No. 670 Dated -25.07.2008
Forwarded the copy of order to the O.C. Kakdwip P.S. for information and necessary action.

Copyright © 2007 Abasar.net. All rights reserved.